|
|
Post by Barbaro on Jan 30, 2012 4:47:46 GMT
What did you think of this game? How could it have been improved? What did you like or dislike about it?
|
|
|
|
Post by Aitou Kaichi on Jan 30, 2012 5:00:08 GMT
What did you think of this game? How could it have been improved? What did you like or dislike about it? We discussed it briefly on msn, and this is the result of me having run a similar game back in lgt1... But the penalty should have been on getting it wrong rather than abstaining. Of course, you could say that they had to actually say "I abstain on guessing who X is" or else they get a penalty. But the approach actually used created up the oppurtunity for luck. |
|
|
|
Post by Aitou Kaichi on Jan 31, 2012 2:37:17 GMT
Another problem with the game was the rules for tiebreakers. If the game was split into equal alliances, and each alliance played the same strategy at every possibility, then the game would never end, since 2 players would have the same amount of points each time, one from each alliance.
I know this isn't LGT1, but we used the much-hated randomization step after tie-breaker votes, with the caveat of "If you don't like it, don't let it get that far."
|
|
